Attorneys representing Barack Obama tried everything they could to sway the judge that this case was frivolous, but Carter would have none of it and cut them off several times. Great day in America for the U. Video from the press conference after the hearing coming soon. Congratulations to plaintiffs attorney Dr. Orly Taitz! She did a great job and won some huge victories today.
She was fearless! Low Rider : It looks like the judge issued an entirely ordinary, boilerplate Initial Scheduling Order. That is some funny misha! That hug pretty much gave it away to me though. According to this recap, Judge Carter said that no discovery can go forward while the motion to dismiss is pending. Remember, as a child, I was dragged to the remnants of Yiddish theatre in NY.
Every question was answered with another question. Well thanks for reminding us all this really is just a big disgraceful joke. Some enjoy arguing all the legalisms, you enjoy pointing out the irony, the silliness, the joke of it all. Youtube video at the link. Here are the results thanks […].
Name required. Email will not be published required. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Navigation Home. By Dr. Conspiracy on September 8, in Lawsuits , Orly Taitz. Call me crazy. A Certification is not a Certificate…. Bob September 8, at pm Bob Quote. The government has a pretty good track record so far… I am just afraid that a bad mistake will get the case tossed when her determination has gotten it this far. John September 8, at pm John Quote.
Conspiracy September 8, at pm Dr. Conspiracy Quote. Rickey September 8, at pm Rickey Quote. Also I see they have placed your site on a rss feed. I am afraid I spend too much time on this business. He is turning us into a third world communist country and proving he is not eligible to be president was the great hope that I had to remove him! What is wrong with you Judge Carter? What kind of payoff did you get or maybe you have converted to being a muslim? Carter has failed to give final judgment in the case Barnett vs.
Obama, leaving the door open to further filings and proceedings. His ruling has not dismissed the case, but rather merely dismissed arguments presented so far. This is the interpretation had if you read the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54 and When an action presents more than one claim for relief — whether as a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim — or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay.
Every judgment and amended judgment must be set out in a separate document, but a separate document is not required for an order disposing of a motion:. From this it can be seen that since the clerk has not yet added a Judgment record to the Docket, that Carter is indicating, despite his heavy handedness to the Plaintiffs, that he might allow a second amended complaint, which includes a request for relief for the political candidates, whom he acknowledged had standing, so long as their request for relief was redressable: such as a monetary reward howsoever small.
Judge Carter has from 10 to 30 days after his ruling on the Motion to Dismiss to add such a judgment dismissing the case with prejudice to the docket, otherwise he is formally indicating that he expects Dr. Orly Taitz, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, and Attorney Gary Kreep, for his plaintiffs, to submit a request to file a second amended complaint. Indeed, without such ruling added to the docket, the Plaintiffs can initiate such a request action.
Well done, Orly Taitz case moves forward solely for Plaintiff Keyes for redressable relief of monetary damages, thereby avoiding political question leave that to Congress once Keyes recovers even nominal damages for pre-Presidential fraud against CandidateObama and Team Obama has nothing to appeal to delay the trial.
Carter is a California Judge. Does anyone know why these Judges try to find a way to avoid justice. It is like they work with the Defendant to figure our a way to circumvent justice. What has happened to our judicial system. It is really rotton and sticks to high heaven. The Judges all needs to be thrown out. They are evil. No tradition, No ceremony, No magic incantation, Changes that. David O. Carter has personally demonstrated that he understands the fraudulent usurpation, and he seemed to believe it in September.
District Judge. He is intimidated, cowed, and coerced. Well Kiddies; Still think Carter was a marine? Maybe he wore the uniform but a marine he was not; Carter is not someone Americans can depend on ; Carter has presented himself as a digraced coward who will forever grace the annals of history to be remembered only as a coward and deceitful protagonist.
His family and relatives will forrever have to bear the burden of his lecherous and evil decision to allow an illegal alien to occupy the white house and assume the office of president ; an individual who has attended a white haters church for 20 years; one who has repeatedly avoided questions on his country of birth and one who openly lied to America numerous times. Yes, judge Carter could have been blessed with recognition exceeding JFK ; instead he chose to remain that which he is and forever will be ; a useless dishonest coward and disgraced moron; one who should be imprisoned for all time and never allowed to co habitate with others.
In Norton vs. Shelby County US p. To me this law says the office of the presidency has not been filled since the act was unconstitutional. What does this law say to a Marine Judge?
The main reason for politicians of either party loosing office in the next election will be due in part at least, to their failure to object to an illegal alien being allowed to act as poser in chief of the US military without objection.
You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account.
You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Citizen WElls. Skip to content. Home About Justice Dept. Judge Carter, are you a coward? Is there some other excuse? That is why we have a system of checks and balances. An expert by training and many years of practice in logic. I have prepared a motion, filed the motion, opposed an attorney and won. Besides that, this is not rocket science.
If not eligible, you have the power and obligation to remove him. Citizen Wells. Share this: Email Reddit Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Bookmark the permalink. JustMe October 29, at pm. ARMY D. V October 29, at pm. Evidently Big O and Fox was involved and had influence in all these court cases.
Pat Smith October 29, at pm. Folks, Do NOT be disheartened. May just be someone who is able to hack into a file or someone who produces a tape. Danny October 29, at pm. District Court in California dismisses Obama case U. HonorFirst, Here is the post about the video. Stresses loyalty to a single leader, and submission to a single nationalistic culture.
Yes Appeal! Linda from NY October 29, at pm. So…what do we have to do in our appeal? Just brainstorming…. Prairie October 29, at pm. Dems and dirty tricks, Minnesota all over. Nancy October 29, at pm. CW I want to thank you again for reporting on this very significant NJ election. Zachjones , I have to agree with you. John Charlton October 29, at pm. Patriot Dreamer October 29, at pm. Beyond that, the following ingredients are necessary: 1. ObamaCare humor:.
Thank you for all your hard work. I look forward to the day it will all come to fruition. SueK October 29, at pm. Judge Carter. CW, Boy, just moments after posting my link on your blog, some nasty Acorn members from Chicago came my way… Why do they care so much about a fringe theory? JeffM October 29, at pm. History is repeating itself. Note to all judges: When dealing with Presidential ineligibility questions you have one of two choices: a. Uphold, prevent revolutionary war, and incite riots OR b.
Magna Carta October 29, at pm. William October 29, at pm. Here is what baffles me with Judge Carters ruling. JJ October 29, at pm. I would suggest everyone take their cameras to record any irregularities. Maddie October 29, at pm. Michelle, Jonah, Prairie et al. Michelle October 29, at pm. Thank you for your service! OT: Sue K: your thoughts on this article would be appreciated…thanks. Even if this did get further, you can be he would have magically disappeared….
I think my child has the flu! Truth Now October 29, at pm. Your Help would be so Appreciated. Kidmon October 29, at pm. Thanks again! Rocknee October 29, at pm. Kidmom D3 are o iu, real small tablets, can swallow easily. Sunnstarr October 30, at am. The truth will eventually come out. However, it may be too late to save our Republic. Patriot Dreamer October 30, at am. Vet October 31, at pm. Obama took a proper oath only the next day, on January 21 st by the undersigned counsel against Mr.
Obama as an individual for his actions as an individual prior to the election , the undersigned counsel has properly served Mr. Obama as an individual under rule 4e and properly demanded from the court a default judgment and post default discovery. As the court refused to grant the default judgment, the undersigned properly demanded certification for the interlocutory appeal. As Mr. Obama and arguing on his behalf, while claiming that Mr. Assistant US attorney, Mr.
DeJute demanded that the undersigned counsel serve Mr. The undersigned attorney properly protested, stating that Mr. Obama was properly served as an individual in regards to fraud that he committed as an individual prior to the election and therefore he is not entitled to be represented by the US attorneys at tax payers expense.
Your honor did not state that the undersigned was wrong in her assessment, but rather stated in presence of 50 observers, that if the undersigned does not serve Mr. Obama the way the government wants , the US attorney will appeal and the case will be sitting in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals for a year, that if the undersigned counsel agrees to serve Mr.
Obama the way the government wants, Your Honor promises that the case will be heard on the merits and will not be dismissed on technicality. Again in front of 50 spectators Your Honor assured that this court has jurisdiction and it is important for this case to be decided not on default judgment, but on the merits, that it is important for the military to know if the Commander in Chief is legitimate, it is important for the whole country.
If he is legitimate he can stay in the White House, if he is not legitimate, he needs to be removed from there. Under duress and tremendous pressure from Your Honor the undersigned counsel has agreed to serve US attorney with the complaint. Her worst fears materialized, as not only Your Honor has dismissed the case claiming lack of jurisdiction, but the whole issue was completely misrepresented and the undersigned counsel was denigrated. In the above mater the court erred both in the fact and the law.
As it stands now, the undersigned counsel, her clients, all of the spectators present in the courtroom and the whole Nation justifiably feel defrauded not only by Mr.
Obama, but also by this court. The court erred in not including in the order and not considering an affidavit of Sandra Ramsey Lines, submitted by the plaintiffs as part of the attachment in Dossier 1 and Dossier 6, as Ms Lines, one of the most renown forensic document expert stated in her affidavit that Mr. Court also erred in omitting from the final order affidavits of licensed investigators Neil Sankey and Susan Daniels.
Court erred in refusing to lift the stay of discovery and granting a motion to dismiss, whereby the court de facto aided and abetted obstruction of Justice by Mr.
The court has misrepresented the allegations in the pleadings. On page 2 line 10 The court states that the complaint pleadings talk about Mr.
This is a misstatement of law and complete misstatement of the pleadings and Oral argument. Obama was born, he was never qualified for presidency, and he admitted it, as he admitted that he had British Citizenship at birth based on the citizenship of his father.
Later he acquired Kenyan and Indonesian citizenship, therefore he did not qualify as a Natural Born Citizen, as from birth and until now he had allegiance to other Nations. Natural born citizen is one born in the country to parents both of them who are Citizens of the country. This definition was widely used by the framers of the Constitution and was quoted by Chief Justice John Jay and the framer of the 14 th amendment John A Bingham.
The word may does not mean exclusive jurisdiction, and as such the undersigned counsel was absolutely correct in her assertion that this court has proper jurisdiction to proceed under quo warranto and she prays that Your Honor proceeds immediately and expeditiously with denying the defendants motion to dismiss Quo Warranto cause of action and grants the plaintiffs lift of stay of discovery so they can complete the discovery by the January 26 trial date.
The court has made an error of fact and completely misstated the FOIA complaint. For lack of better words it simply put the FOIA complaint on its head. The undersigned counsel did not state that the FOIA requests need to be send to the defendants, who are individuals, but simply said that in the period of nearly a year she has sent requests for information and request to take proper action to numerous agencies around the country, requesting information about the defendants, and since Mr.
Obama has sealed all of his vital records by the executive order on the first day of office, further FOIA requests would be futile. The undersigned counsel has submitted voluminous dossiers as attachments and showed the court that she undertook a Herculean effort to obtain proper information from the Department of Justice, State department, FBI, CIA, Secret Service, Social Security Administration, Selective Service to name a few.
Simply put there is a wall of silence and lack of response from all of the agencies and therefore a judicial determination and an order of discovery from the trial judge is needed. As there is an error of fact in the order, the undersigned counsel requests to deny the defendants motion to dismiss, and to lift the stay of discovery, so the plaintiffs can complete the proper discovery and proceed on FOIA cause of action at the scheduled trial date of January The court erred in its assertion that Mr.
Obama has submitted his birth certificate. The whole point is that he submitted a photo shopped computer image of a short version Certification of Life Birth, obtained in , that does not provide the name of the hospital, name of the doctor or signatures. Obama has sealed his original birth certificate. State of Hawaii allows one to get a birth certificate based on an uncorroborated statement of one relative only, as such there is a need to unseal the original birth certificate , birthing file and other vital records in order to ascertain his Natural Born Status.
The court has made an error of law in regards to the declaratory relief cause of action. From p. Even if one were to assume arguendo that the court has no power to remove Mr. Obama from office, it has absolutely nothing to do with the Declaratory Relief. In the declaratory relief the plaintiffs are simply looking for the judicial determination of the meaning of the Natural Born Citizen and factual determination, whether Mr.
Obama possess proper vital records and citizenship status to qualify as a Natural Born Citizen. This is an issue of first impression, it is ripe and it is of the paramount importance for the country as a whole and particularly for the military that needs to take orders from Mr.
Obama as the Commander in Chief. Judicial determination in the form of the declaratory relief is the exclusive domain of the judiciary, it is an Article 3 issue. The Congress has absolutely no power to issue declaratory relief, it has no power to interpret the Constitution, and regardless of the mechanism by which Mr Obama will be later removed from office: Quo Warranto or impeachment, the judicial determination, the declaratory relief has to be done now and it has to be done here.
As such the undersigned counsel prays that your Honor deny the defendants motion to dismiss Declaratory Relief cause of action and grant the lift of discovery so that the undersigned counsel can complete her discovery on the Declaratory Relief cause of action by the January 26 date, set for the jury trial.
Lastly the court erred in fact of law and fact on the issue of the political doctrine, justiciability and separation of powers.
The defense would like to turn this issue into the political doctrine, however it is not an issue of politics , it is an issue of fraud committed prior to taking office. The plaintiffs were not seeking to enjoin any particular decisions of the executive branch, but rather fraud committed by one in order to become the Chief Executive. As the undersigned read to the court a letter written by Senator Sessions of Alabama, the Congress is relying on the courts to resolve the issue of eligibility.
The Congress and Senate do not have any power to ascertain whether Mr. Obama is eligible according to the Constitution. They are relying on you, Your Honor, to make a Judicial Determination, provide declaratory relief and they can take action upon your determination.
In undying words of Chief Judge John Marshall, not exercising jurisdiction, when it is available, is treason to the Constitution. Therefore there is not only a potential for justiciability, but obligation to take action based on justiciability.
In which way can jurisdiction and justiciability be asserted? If we could send a man to the Moon, we can figure out the issues of the separation of powers, justiciability and jurisdiction. In the humble opinion of the undersigned proper cause of action provided several avenues: a declaratory relief on Mr. After many years of test taking in medicine and law, the undersigned believes that all of the above is the most comprehensive, all encompassing answer.
WHEREFORE, for all of the foregoing reasons Plaintiffs respectfully request their motion for reconsideration granted and the defendants motion to dismiss denied, or in the alternative the plaintiffs seek the leave of court to file a second amended complaint against Mr.
Obama specifically on Declaratory Relief, R. Orly Taitz, Esq. California Bar WEST roger. Declaration of Orly Taitz.
0コメント